Home  /  Toolkits  /  ESG

Regime 03 · ESG Governance & Greenwashing Risk

An ESG claim is now a legal exposure, not a marketing line.

A net-zero pledge, a "sustainable" label or a responsible-sourcing claim is read by regulators, litigators and investors as a representation that must be substantiated. In the UK, the CMA can now act directly on misleading environmental claims, with penalties of up to 10 per cent of global turnover. The defence is not better wording — it is governance: a claim-substantiation discipline a board can stand behind.

View ESG toolkits Book a claims-risk call
up to 10%CMA fine — global turnover (DMCC Act)
FCA ruleAnti-greenwashing rule in force
IFRS S1/S2ISSB investor-grade baseline
Board-levelAccountability for claims made

The risk surface

Three pressures converging on the same claim.

Greenwashing risk no longer sits with one regulator. It is the intersection of consumer-protection enforcement, financial-conduct rules and investor due diligence — each able to test the same public statement against the evidence behind it.

Consumer-protection

The CMA's Green Claims Code, now backed by direct DMCC enforcement powers and turnover-based penalties.

Financial-conduct

The FCA anti-greenwashing rule and Sustainability Disclosure Requirements for regulated firms and labelled products.

Investor scrutiny

ISSB IFRS S1 and S2 setting the comparability bar that diligence teams and lenders increasingly apply.

Litigation & activism

NGOs and shareholders testing transition claims through complaints, advertising challenges and the courts.

The substantiation gap. Most organisations can state their claims; far fewer can produce, on demand, the evidence chain that supports each one. That gap is the liability — and it is closed by governance architecture, not by editing the website.

Who this concerns

Anyone who makes — or signs off — a green claim.

Boards & directors

Ultimately accountable for the truth of the organisation's environmental representations.

Marketing & IR

Teams drafting the claims that create the exposure, often without a substantiation gate.

ESG & sustainability

Functions expected to hold the evidence but rarely given the governance authority to enforce it.

Investor-facing companies

Firms whose transition narrative is tested in capital-raising, diligence and rating processes.


ESG instruments

From a quick risk scan to a board-grade governance system.

Authored legal-risk intelligence — not a generic policy template. Instant download, transparent sterling pricing.

Forthcoming · PDF

Greenwashing-Risk Checklist

Marketing, investor-relations & ESG teams reviewing public claims.

  • Claim-substantiation tests
  • Red-flag language register
  • UK CMA & FCA prompts
£49PDF checklist
Register interest
Governance toolkit

ESG Legal Risk & Board Governance Toolkit

Boards, investors & ESG teams managing greenwashing and claim-substantiation risk.

  • ESG governance charter & terms of reference
  • Claim-substantiation discipline
  • Greenwashing red-flag register
  • Investor due-diligence preparation set
£497Governance toolkit
Buy the toolkit

An ESG governance template pack and an investor due-diligence pack are also in development for this regime.


From toolkit to mandate

Stress-test your claims before someone else does.

An ESG claims-risk call reviews your highest-exposure public statements against the substantiation a regulator or litigator would demand, and shows where the governance gap sits.